Given that I don’t plan on turning this into a linker blog, these plug posts will only be on Sunday afternoons from here on out.
First up, Beta Prime has an interesting post on how betas can interact with blacks:
My approach with black females is to treat each of them like they are the hottest white girl I’ve ever seen. They lap up attention like any girl, even if you’re white, but especially if you happen to be a guy who is desired by white females. Females hate all other females. This is even more true when it comes to black female on white female hate. White females have been ‘taking their strong black men’, and they hate them for it.
Ideas good, bad, and weird are contained in that link.
Next up, Default User advises the ladies on how to win over an alpha male:
Let him know those three things. Communicate them clearly in your looks, words and actions. Adore him: he is the greatest and you are lucky to have him. Respect him: you do not always have to agree but never ever put him down in private or especially public. Lust for him: I am not sure what the male equivalent of “gina tingle” is but he should feel it. In less poetic terms: Don’t give backchat but do give blowjobs.
Want to hold onto any man, ladies? Keep his balls empty and his stomach full.
Sofia reminds us all why you shouldn’t drink and blog:
Guuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuyyyyyyyyysssssssssss.
Ungh god
There’s also a Carl Jung quote in there, if that’s your shot of vodka.
Roissy has an insightful post on the growing popularity of Amish bodice rippers:
Amish men, listen up! You’ve allowed a sliver of the heathen slut culture to invade your oasis. Your womenfolk are reading crass female porn under their bedcovers. And make no mistake, it is PORNOGRAPHY. Cheap thrills to tingle ginas. It’s just a small step from there to Amish women demanding equality in the fields and nagging you to do more housework. Then comes Amish feminism (6th wave? It’s all the same briny crap) and finally Amish bukkake. Give an inch, and they’ll make you yearn for the relative modesty of Rumspringa. If this doesn’t scare you straight, try picturing a guy like me seducing one of your bonnet-wearing daughters, my hand first touching her forearm, then her thigh, a neg lighting up her eyes, and a makeout behind the hay bales as I promise her a world of adventure and excitement.
As an aside, while I note that social conservatives inveigh against male pornography all the time, I have yet to see one of them say an unkind word against female pornography, despite the fact that the latter is both equally destructive and far more ubiquitous (you can buy it at Walmart, for Woden’s sake). Another reason why their credibility is shot.
Roosh discovers the reason why American women are just so goddamn unbearable:
You will see that the American woman has aquired what I call the Essence Of Man. Her neverending quest for equality has indeed worked, for a part of a man’s brain has sprouted inside their own. Understand: American women are hermaphroditic when it comes to their behavior, personality, and attitude. When you date an American woman, you are dating a part-man and not a true woman. For that you actually need to go abroad.
American chicks – fuck ‘em, chuck ‘em, and find the mother of your children abroad.
Aoefe talks about appearance, imagination and physical attraction:
What I really think happens is they’ve formulated an idea of what the person looks like before they’ve met them. They have ideas of what they find attractive in looks, dress and demeanor. The only thing they’re privy to in dating in the dark is personality and kissing. Not to underestimate kissing mind you but in spite of hot kissing prior to the reveal the actual person’s appearance will stop them cold. One episode had a sketch artist draw what the dates thought their date would look like. They had very real images without even talking to their partner about what they looked like! When they actually saw they looked nothing like they imagined, although attractive, they lost interest. Men in particular would say “she’s not my type”.
Imagination rarely ever lives up to reality.
Talleyrand shows us that being nice isn’t something to strive for:
I repeat, that although men have been taught to be nice, it is not a virtue. It is in fact the opposite, it is a vice. An addiction. Something that nice guys can’t help doing, and continue to do, even though it doesn’t get them what they want, like a junkie or gambling addict, they keep doing more of it until it leads them to ruin.
Niceness != kindness – a distinction most are unable to make.
OneSTDV wraps up his interesting four-part series on education. From the final entry:
While the educational system continually reminds us that education is a requirement of successful people, real world jobs have only a tenuous connection to classroom instruction. Ignoring the numerous counterexamples of autodidacts, one must only look at the daily tasks of salespeople, secretaries, business executives, real estate agents, journalists, and store managers to see the absurdity of stating one needs four years to qualify for these positions. College instruction is often tangential to real world job duties and if necessary, it provides only a rudimentary foundation for future work. In many cases, college work will do almost nothing to prepare a worker, such as teachers who study abstruse sociological theory in order to handle 30 rambunctious nine year-olds.
I’m totally in agreement.
Another MRA blogger, MisAnDrope, takes on game:
Now, there are those who criticize ‘Gaming’ the system from a couple points of view:
1) Isn’t it unethical to pretend to be someone you are not/act in unusual ways to get somewhere with a woman – isn’t it misleading?
2) Isn’t this bad for the men involved, and our culture?
Now I can hear both of these criticisms, and I relate. On #1, it seems to me, a real man would be himself, no? On the other hand, when faced with a blatantly unfair ‘game’ where the other participants are not being anywhere near themselves (lipstick? blush? perfume? hair removal?) and are liable/likely to revert to a much scarier form once they ‘have’ you, perhaps ‘Game’ is very defensible. Especially when the culture/system we are playing into punishes long term relationships by USUALLY taking half of your assets, and potentially half of your income, and your progeny.
MisAnDrope updates infrequently, but his stuff is always worth reading.
Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech shares his thoughts on why liberating Muslim women from “oppression” is a fruitless endeavor:
Even knowing this why were Iranian women so against the Shah because wasn’t he granting them increased political freedom? The Shah was doing that, but outside of a handful of women, women aren’t interested in political freedom. I was reading another MRA blog recently and someone pointed out how once the government/elites were done taking all freedom away from men, they would start taking away the freedom of women. Someone else correctly pointed out that women aren’t going to notice or care that the government/elites are taking away their freedom. Whether its in Iran or the West, outside of a handful of women, women aren’t interested in freedom.
As I’ve written elsewhere, institutionalized polygamy in the Middle East is a paradise for alphas and women, and hell for betas.
Welmer laments the rise of credentialism in our increasingly feminized world:
Unfortunately, our society is becoming more and more obsessed with standardized credentials, even as there has been a broad devaluation of the credentials themselves. This means that although it no longer means all that much to have a higher degree (due to affirmative action, grade inflation and other factors), the degrees themselves have become more of a necessity for even entry-level jobs that require few skills beyond typing and filing. This is preventing plenty of talented people – mainly young men – from obtaining positions in organizations in which they could potentially contribute a great deal.
Credentials? CREDENTIALS? We don’t need no stinking credentials!
Half Sigma remarks on the inability of so many college students to graduate in four years’ time:
Students who attend college but never graduate have the worst of both worlds: they have the debt of college graduates but without the credential. It would be better for everyone (except for people hoping to become college professors) if colleges just flunked out freshman who can’t keep up on a four-year track.
The college scam will soon be undone, and America will be better off for it.
Speaking of unresolvable clusterfucks, Marty Nemko ticks off the reasons why unemployment is not going down:
Time magazine proposes the typical liberal solutions that have already been tried and failed: funding colleges more and job retraining. We already have the highest percentage of college graduates in American history and as discussed earlier, employers are yawning at them because all we’ve done is taken weak high school students, lowered standards in college, but radicalized them to demand the moon from employers. So employers offshore, automate, or temp as many positions as possible. Regarding job retraining, it’s been tried and tried, and those federal training programs fail: cost a fortune per trainee and most trainees don’t land a job in their new career or don’t last.
Always remember, never forget: America is screwed.
Yasha Levine infiltrates a town hall meeting in Victorville, California, and gives us yet another reason to hate the Baby Boomers:
On some primitive level, the old people around me understood what I had not: the fight for healthcare reform is not just pitting the average American against giant health insurance vampires. It is also a fight between the young and the old, between the giant, aging Baby Boomer generation and the rest of us. They understand that we want to have some of what they have. But they are greedy, self-centered geriatric vampires and they do not want to share.
No single generation has done more damage to Western civilization than the Boomers. Epochs from now, history will gleefully piss on their crumbling bones.
Hermes, taking a page out of A.J. Travis’ book, asks whether men or women should be blamed for the current sexual dystopia:
This tendency to blame and hate women that arises in some segments of the MRA/MGTOW community appears to be a relatively recent phenomenon. I’m not sure why this is. It could be that traditional society carried an implicit recognition that women were fallen creatures too, but was also resigned to the fact that women were going to do what they were going to do, and given the necessity of men leading and women following, thought it more important to discipline men. (Incidentally, this would contradict the Roissysphere’s description of men as keys who will adapt themselves to whatever shape women choose their locks to take, but that is a topic for another entry.) And it could be that in modern society, even MRAs/MGTOWers have unconsciously absorbed the belief in female equality, so they expect women to make decisions on the same basis as men do, and become angry at them when they don’t.
It’s an interesting thought.
Libertarian Canuck Freedom Manitoba comments on a recent brothel shutdown in Winnipeg:
Because of the prohibited activities that surround prostitution it is difficult to engage in it without breaking any laws. Perhaps that is the purpose that some of these moralists have, to make it more difficult and force their morals onto other people. While it might do that, it doesn’t stop people from participating in it, just makes it more dangerous.
Manitoba – my third-favorite Canadian province.
Finally, the sadly underrated but intriguing Vera offers her sincere thoughts on game and what she looks for in a man:
Familiarity has its degrees, as does attractiveness. My taste is farther out than most, but they all differ a bit. Remember that if women rate you on a 1-10 attractiveness scale some of them will give you a couple more points than you would receive on average. I don’t know how one would go around finding them, though.
Her candid comments are in line with both the beliefs of game and Roissy’s description of Finnish women:
If you think teasing is all part of the fun of flirting, you will not get along with a Finn. Joking banter that arouses an American girl will send a Finn rearing up with indignation at your effrontery. You will be left scratching your head at how someone could be so hypersensitive to your playful humor. I used to call my Finnish girl “finn-skinned”. She almost cried. The upside is that a Finn chick is a naif in the art of head games, so you’ll never have to deal with her flirting with other guys in a bar just to make you jealous. Finns are introverted. There is a sly Finnish joke that goes: How can you tell if you’re talking to an extroverted Finn? He looks at your shoes. But don’t mistake this aversion to sociability for weakness. Remember, these are the people who held off a much larger Soviet invading force. And the best sniper in history was this guy. A Finn girl’s introversion hides a surprising strength of character. She won’t tolerate her man walking all over her. Fiercely loyal and commitment-oriented, Finns make fantastic girlfriends. More than other women, Finns appreciate small gestures like spontaneously buying her a rocket pop from an ice cream truck. Finn girls smell fantastic and look ten years younger than their age.
Remember that “the best stereotypes are rooted in truth.”
No comments:
Post a Comment